During a visit with my parents in the end of January I had my son’s official order to leave him alone with his grandparents “for a long time” and dutifully obeyed by going to see another museum. It is slightly strange to ‘return’ to the city where one grew up after more than twenty years and realize how many things have indeed changed. Don’t get me wrong, I did visit my parents during all those years, but somehow I never took the chance to explore the city that I left when I went off to study at the university in 1985. I had never been to the ZKM yet, a museum for contemporary art and media, which officially opened in 1989, so I was glad I finally got a chance.
|On the way from the streetcar-stop to the entrance of ZKM|
I had found out beforehand that the exhibition “The Global Contemporary – Art Worlds after 1989” was on and thought that this would be an interesting destination. www.global-contemporary.de The ZKM is located in what once used to be a production site for weapons and ammunition. Tens of thousands of enslaved laborers from
Europe were working here during World War II, and more than 600
died on the site. Something I did not know when I grew up here.
The huge buildings are also home to the
, besides housing
contemporary art exhibits. Art
However, this was an exhibition that I felt inadequately prepared for while I was walking through the rooms. I definitely should have taken the time and read the introductory pages of the paper that accompanies the exhibition before entering, it might have helped to overcome this feeling of incompetence. But because I had other plans for the afternoon I felt as if I did not have enough time to do that, and went in open for the challenge.
The first rooms gave a historic and theoretic overview of the events that the curators say set the stage for what is happening in the art world right now. The year 1989, with its political upheavals, the invention of the WorldWideWeb, the launching of the first GPS satellite, amongst others, is considered to be the year that introduced globalization, a term not really heard of or used before. Today, everything in the world seems to be subject to globalization, and the art world is no exemption. A major claim – as far as I understood – is that contemporary art today is not only “new art” made today, but a new kind of art, produced under totally different conditions. The exhibition wants to present global practices that have influenced and shaped modern art as much as the new media had just before that.
The exhibition itself is divided into seven separate sections that are not clearly separated, however, so the viewer keeps changing back and forth between the different sections unless you kept referring to the floor plan in the middle of the catalogue paper. Which gave me a feeling of being slightly lost between nothing and everything. The sections have titles such as “Lost in translation”, “World Art” or “Art as product”. All participating artists are each presented briefly in the catalogue paper:
An artist-in-residence-programme is also part of the exhibition, and the artists included are presented in the catalogue paper with individual statements, such as this one by Ruth Sacks.
Many of the works presented are fotos, C-prints or videos, but ‘sculptures’, mixed media installation or paintings appear just as well:
|Sculpture made from colored plastic bags, |
as shown in catalogue paper
In the section titled “Border line experiences” I particularly liked Leila Pazooki’s
piece of light art “Moments of Glory” (find a picture here), in which she sheds light on patronizing comparisons used in media coverage of so-called budding artists.
As with almost any modern art exhibition, there was little textile art, except for some pieces in mixed media installations, among them “Para-Production”, a huge textile experiment by Ni Haifeng in which visitors could become collaborators in the production of the piece by sitting down and sewing a few pieces onto the pieace already on display.
Somewhere in the exhibition I read that the central question of the art world is a problem of inclusion and exclusion – the so-called third-world countries used to be excluded from the world art market and are now much more at the center than before, whereas the so-called western world is being pushed to the edges, is on the way to exclusion. Wouldn’t it be nice if quilts could leave their place where they are still being excluded from the world art market, and enter a stage where they are included in the definition of contemporary art works? Or should we just start calling them mixed media installations, or performance, or something like that? Perhaps we would receive more attention that way.
Too bad that I had more plans for the afternoon, it might have well been worth staying on to get a better understanding of what I was seeing. And the show closed at the
venue just a few days after my visit, otherwise I definitely would have tried
to go back on another occasion. But it is supposed to travel internationally –
unfortunately, though, the catalogue paper does not give any indication, where
and when you might get a chance to grab it. It’s well worth seeing – just give
yourself a lot of time! And read at least the first pages of the paperwork
before entering the show rooms. Karlsruhe